Nor the mirrors, but when Iįirst read it I assumed that that was the case.
Also its not clear to me that the candles The reason being that you need to be able to move around, turn around And they are far enoughĪpart that it’s able to cast a lot of light in a particular location. Of angle passing light between each other. IĪssume what’s happening here is both mirrors are actually at a kind Is hard for me to figure out is basically how are you passing a moonīeam back to a mirror while reflecting the mirrors to each other. Sure, so I presume from these step forward it’s just the one candleĪnd around here means “near” and not literally “around.” You’re spinning with the candles on the edges so there’s always aĬandle in some kind of sight line as you’re spinning. You’re spinning not only in the moonbeam mirror pathway, but also so Have some configuration of candle where you have literally theseĬandles with the initials pointed toward you so you can see them, allīurn, all waiting for you to burn them down. That you have basically these three candles here and each of theĬandles will have your initials on them wherever you look. What the author means for you to do based on this “around you” is I guess it’s about trying to capture the “Golden” without Is the Sun’s color technically if memory serves me) or not Silver With some level of correspondence, but why not use gold (though that I assume it’s again about trying to blend in
And the same thing goes with the color choices here The reason why this author has chosen three candles and it’s not Make sense that you’d have just a random three in here if they don’tĬollectively serve a purpose here. If we go based on the occult “rules” of numbers in magic (soġ,3,5,7,9, etc being all very magical numbers in general – whichĬan be linked to social ideas or can be linked to Hermetic principlesĭepending on what kind of reason why they are magical), it doesn’t The case for a vast number of people) that you would carve a single Sense if the author things we only have three initials (which is not Only one of the candles, not the other two. We take one candle from the three and carve out initials on So for instance, we have these three candles Me, but there are definitely things that make me a little confusedĪbout what it’s doing. This has the making of a very interesting and very complete spell for (Card Type: Golden Opportunities, Spells & Charms, by Nicola De Pulford) Then retire and sleep with the honesty seeds under your pillow. Open yourself to receive all that comes your way. Turn around clockwise, seven times, trailing the cord around you to gather the moonbeams about your body. Stand in the beam of moonlight and absorb its energy while the candle burns and frees the letters of your name. Light the candles and return to your place, holding the orange cord in your right hand and the honesty seeds in your left. Stand midway between the mirrors with the candles around you, so that you can see your initials on the candle. Take one of the candles and warm it so that you can scratch your initials at the top in warm wax. Place the mirrors opposite each other so that one mirror reflects a moonbeam back into the other. sigh-Ī spell to make you receptive to all the opportunities within your touch. Yall are spoiled because I’m typing out all these spells for you. It’s a massive double-standard, and it’s - if you’ll pardon my French - fucking annoying as fuck. Just something I’ve been thinking about today…I think the reason “open for interpretation” bothers me (and other people) as an answer for things (anything) is…it’s not, really “open” is it? Because it always seems to be just fine to interpret something that’s ambiguous (or obviously queer-coded) as straight but there’s always some kind of push-back if you want to interpret something (ambiguous or otherwise) as queer. Akiema: 🐱 S t u d i o G h i b l i + C a t s 🐈
0 kommentar(er)
